3D graphic stating, "The Skeptical Review Online"



Why Would God Bless America?
by Farrell Till




The ancient Hebrews believed that their god Yahweh had selected them from all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his chosen people (Deut. 7:6). This belief was so deeply ingrained in their culture that their prophets and clerics predicted that their nation would last forever (2 Sam. 7:13). They were very wrong, of course, but their chosen-people ideology was by no means unique. Many other nations of that era also believed that they were the special people of their gods. In the inscription on the Moabite Stone, for example, king Mesha spoke of special favors that he had received from his god Chemosh and the victories over Moab's enemies that Chemosh had given to him.

    I, Mesha son of Chemosh-Melech king of Moab, the Dibonite. My father reigned over Moab thirty years and I reigned after my father. I made this monument to Chemosh at Korkhah. A monument of salvation, for he saved me from all invaders, and let me see my desire upon all my enemies. Omri [was] king of Israel, and he oppressed Moab many days, for Chemosh was angry with his land. His son followed him, and he also said: I will oppress Moab. In my days Chemosh said; I will see my desire on him and his house. And Israel surely perished for ever. Omri took the land of Medeba and [Israel] dwelt in it during his days and half the days of his son, altogether forty years. But there dwelt in it Chemosh in my days. I built Baal-Meon and made therein the ditches; I built Kirjathaim. The men of Gad dwelt in the land of Ataroth from of old, and built there the king of Israel Ataroth; and I made war against the town and seized it. And I slew all the [people of] the town, for the pleasure of Chemosh and Moab: I captured from thence the Arel of Dodah and tore him before Chemosh in Kerioth: And I placed therein the men of Sh(a)r(o)n, and the men of M(e)kh(e)rth. And Chemosh said to me: Go, seize Nebo upon Israel; and I went in the night and fought against it from the break of dawn till noon: and I took it, and slew all, 7,000 men, [boys?], women, [girls?] and female slaves, for to Ashtar-Chemosh I devoted them. And I took from it the Arels of Yahweh, and tore them before Chemosh. And the king of Israel built Jahaz, and dwelt in it, while he waged war against me; Chemosh drove him out before me. And I took from Moab 200 men, all chiefs, and transported them to Jahaz, which I took, to add to it Dibon (emphasis added).

Mesha's belief that he was a favorite of his god reads like a page out of the Old Testament, which tells of many biblical "heroes" who presumably communed with Yahweh and received direct messages from him (Josh. 1:1; 1 Sam. 10:22; 1 Sam. 23:2). Assurnasirpal, an 8th-century BC Assyrian king, who designated as his capital Calah, the city attributed in Genesis 10:8-11 to Nimrod, left an inscription on the pavement slabs at the entry to the temple of Urta in Nimrud [Calah] in which he credited to "the great gods" his success in conquering Kinabu, a fortified city in Hulai, where he killed 600 warriors and burned 3,000 captives.

 At that time, I received tribute of the land of Isala--cattle, flocks, and wine. To the mountain of Kashirari I crossed, to Kinabu, the fortified city of Hulai I drew near. With the masses of my troops and by my furious battle onset I stormed, I captured the city; 600 of their warriors I put to the sword; 3,000 captives I burned with fire; I did not leave a single one among them alive to serve as hostage. Hulai, their governor, I captured alive. Their corpses I formed into pillars; their young men and maidens I burned in the fire. Hulai, their governor, I flayed, his skin I spread upon the wall of the city of Damdamusa; the city I destroyed, I devastated with fire (Crane Brinton, A History of Western Morals, Harcourt, Brace, & Co., p. 48).

This too reads like a page out of the Bible, where, as I previously noted in "God Is Pro-Life?" the barbarism of the Israelites, presumably commanded by their god Yahweh, was described in detail. As the inscription on the pavement slabs of the Assyrian temple continued, Assurnasirpal clearly indicated his belief that, just as the Israelites believed that their god Yahweh directed them to leave no one alive to breath in their conquests, his gods were guiding him to perpetrate acts of barbarism on his captives.

    And now at the command of the great gods my sovereignty, my dominion, my power, are manifesting themselves; I am regal, I am lordly, I am exalted, I am mighty, I am honored, I am glorified, I am preeminent, I am powerful, I am valiant, I am lion-brave, and I am heroic! Assur-Nasir-Pal, the mighty king, the king of Assyria, chosen of Sin, favorite of Anu, beloved of Adad, mighty one among the gods, I am the merciless weapon that strikes down the land of his enemies... (Ibid.).

Sin, Anu, and Adad were Assyrian gods who Assurnasirpal thought had chosen him to be the conquering king of Assyria, so belief that one's nation had been chosen by the gods was an ideology that was commonplace at that time. It is a belief that should have died centuries ago, but, regrettably, it still survives today, where we see it expressed in God-Bless-America bumper stickers, the same slogan with which many politicians have long believed that they must end all of their speeches. We see the survival of this chosen-of-God superstition in the outrage of those who rail against even the mere suggestion that "under God," which was added in the mid-50s, should be dropped from the pledge of allegiance to return it to its original wording that spoke of "one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all." We see it in the support-our-troops and pray-for-our-troops bumper stickers and magnetic ribbons on the backs of cars. I am writing this on the day that the death toll of America's troops in Iraq passed 1800. I have to wonder how many would have been killed if so many Americans who think that God is on our side had not been praying for "our troops."

I am not trying to sound flippant about this, just realistic. In "God Is Pro-Life?" I pointed out the obvious inconsistency in this slogan and in the way the Bible depicted this god who is supposed to be "pro-life." I see the same kind of inconsistency in the slogan Pray for Our Troops and the reality of the casualty figures that keep mounting as this war drags on. If God were really on the side of American troops, would praying for them even be necessary? If God were really on the side of American troops, would there have been any casualty numbers at all? Asking this may not be as out of order as some superpatriots may believe, because a little-known biblical story indicates that when God is really with an army, all of them will come back home safely. In Numbers 31, the God who many in our country believe is on our side in times of war, commanded the Israelites to invade the country of Median. The invasion was carried out, and the Israelite army killed all of the male Midianites (Num. 31:7), brought the women and children back as captives (vs:9-11), and then killed all of the captives except for the virgin girls (vs:17-18). After all of these details were related, the claim was made that when the soldiers who had returned from battle were counted, "not a one of [them] was missing" (v:49). I would say that this story--if it could be believed--would show what really happens when God is with an army. I have to wonder, then, why 1800 of our soldiers have been killed in a war in which so many people in this country believe that God is on our side. If no one had prayed for U. S. troops in Iraq, would this God who is on their side have allowed 3600 or 5400 to be killed instead of the 1800 who have so far died?

The belief that God is on the side of a particular nation is, of course, rooted in religion, but apparently few Christians who hold to this belief ever take the time to consider how inconsistent it is with the Bible, which is the basis of their religion. Those who cling to this belief hang on to it with one hand and to the Bible with the other, not realizing that if God does indeed favor one nation over others, he violates the principle, enunciated many times in the Bible, that says that he does not show partiality.

    Deuteronomy 10:17 For Yahweh your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who is not partial and takes no bribe....

    2 Chronicles 19:7 Now, let the fear of Yahweh be upon you; take care what you do, for there is no perversion of justice with Yahweh our God, or partiality, or taking of bribes.

    Acts 10:34 Then Peter began to speak to them: "I truly understand that God shows no partiality, 35 but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him."

    Romans 2:11 For God shows no partiality.

    Galatians 2:6 And from those who were supposed to be acknowledged leaders (what they actually were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)--those leaders contributed nothing to me.

    Colossians 3:25 For the wrongdoer will be paid back for whatever wrong has been done, and there is no partiality.

    1 Peter 1:17 If you invoke as Father the one who judges all people impartially according to their deeds, live in reverent fear during the time of your exile.

Now with these texts in mind, consider the incongruity in the two statements below.
# God shows partiality to no one.
# God favors the nation of X over other nations.

Let X be any nation--Israel, Spain, Italy, France, Canada, the United States; it doesn't matter, because to say that God favors Israel or France or the United States over all other nations would mean that the Bible is inconsistent. I don't think that very many Christians, especially those who are conservative in their beliefs, want to accept that consequence.

The irony of a nation's believing that it has been "chosen of God" is seen in the fact that other nations believe the same thing. We saw above that the Assyrians, like the Israelites, thought that they were favored by their gods, yet these nations were sometimes enemies on the battlefield. How is it possible for "God" to favor both sides engaged in mortal combat? Well, the answer is simple: it isn't possible. This can be seen in the fact that both the Americans and the Germans in World War II thought that God was on their side. German soldiers even wore belts that had Gott Mitt Uns [God with us] stamped on the buckles. This German buckle had the Gott Mitt Uns inscription stamped around images of an eagle perched on a swastika, and it clearly indicated a belief that God was fighting on the side of the Germans. I can remember hearing a speech by President Franklin Roosevelt made on D-Day 1944 in which he prayed for God to be with our soldiers who were fighting on the beaches of Normandy. Despite the prayer, 9,000 American soldiers were killed in an assault in which God was presumably with the invading army, and the Germans, who thought that God was with them, lost 20,000 during the invasion. In these statistics, we see again the irony in this misguided belief that God is on the side of certain chosen nations. Allied forces landed on Normandy, thinking that God was on their side, as they were fighting German soldiers who thought that God was with them. In Iraq today--even though hundreds of our soldiers are being killed--many in this country believe that God is on our side as our soldiers fight Muslim "insurgents" who think that Allah is on their side. What a testament to human ignorance!

When I hear the God-bless-American slogan bandied about, I can't help wondering why God would want to bless this country any more than, say, Canada or France or Australia or Japan. Although not the highest in the world, we do have a high incidence of violent crimes in this country compared to others. The murder rate here is 0.04 per 1000 people compared to just 0.01 in Canada, Iceland, Italy, Germany, New Zealand, Norway, Denmark, and the much maligned country of France, and the rate is so low in Greece, Indonesia, and Japan that it doesn't even statistically register. We provide lucrative markets for drug cartels and pornography peddlers, and we have a country that now has arguably the most corrupt administration in my 72-year memory, which promotes a policy of helping the rich and turning blind eyes to the plight of the less fortunate. This policy is completely contrary to very fundamental principles of Christianity that were discussed in detail in "The Morality of the Christian Right."

Why would God want to bless a country that has so many official policies that run completely contrary to fundamental principles of the religion that his son presumably died to establish? The answer is that he doesn't. The notion that God favors one nation over others is an ethnocentric belief, born in a superstitious age, that has managed to survive beyond its time. It is an ideology that has caused more human grief and misery than I care to think about.



Rollover button for Main Menu pageRollover button for Forums pageRollover button for Frequently Asked QuestionsRollover button for Contact Us page

within   using